23/07579/OUTEA - Land Off Princes Road, Bourne End, Buckinghamshire (part 3 of 4)

On one hand we're thinking about impact on residents and traffic flows. I'm debating whether there is a cost element as to why one is preferred over the other or not. Potentially. There's not a cost element for the Council.

I'll direct that question to the applicant. Is there a cost element of a proposal A versus proposal B?

Essentially I'm turning around says are you using a Bridgestone Lane? Is that a preferred option because it costs the applicant less money but might impact the residents more? I think there is a cost saving.